Some quick thoughts about sin.
I love the world of National Public Radio. Several years ago I listened with interest to an interview with deeply baritoned African-American poet and professor who shared both his poems and teaching experience. (I wish I could remember his name.) Besides the voice, the one thing I remember is an anecdote he told of a certain religious student in his class whose poems fell flat. “The problem with your poems” he said, “is they don’t have any sin.” Accordingly, the next day she showed up in class with a plunging red dress. (I think that latter line was a joke.)
Anyway, I’ve often thought about that and other issues of sin as they relate to the creations of “sanctified” folk. On one hand, followers of Jesus are to hate sin. We are told, “touch not the unclean thing… hate evil, do good … Whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are pure -- If there be any virtue, if there be any praise, think on these things.”
One can imagine then, why a student of the Way might have difficulty including much about sin in her poems. On the other hand (and this is a big hand) we have a holy book so stuffed with sin, that the idea of neither writing nor thinking about sin, is made ludicrous by the very book that teaches us to forego sin. We are awash in drama, and drama seems to need sin. Crack open any page of holy writ and put your finger down. Bloody murder, torture, rape, sodomy, pride, idolatry, religious tyranny, lying and deception, etc. leap from the pages. In short, you are likely to find descriptions or warning about human vices ranging from the petty to perverse, often carried out by hands of “saints.” As a child I was introduced to some categories of human conduct that I never would have imagined had I not read about them in the scriptures first.
So, here we have it. A riddle of deepest proportions. God, who hates sin, quite active in the business of drama. He crafts its, sets the stage, then crashes his own play taking one of the parts. And the same God “who can not look upon sin” (in one sense) looked at it hard with human eyes, even as He looks at it every day all the time. How could he see otherwise?
My goal here is not to solve this riddle but reflect on it from various angles. I will write more later, but for now my goal is to consider our right response to the one who both finds our behavior sinful, and has provided for a redemption and deepest freedom from that which names us.
We are sinners. And these are sinful poems.
This is a collection in process, and may not be ready for real viewing for some time. You can however, post any of your own sin poems or quotes in the reply section.
a meditation on the mystery of
e e e evil , & the beauty
of redemp t ion.
Kirk Jordan
.
Certain new theologians dispute original sin, which is the only part of Christian theology which can really be proved. Some followers of the Reverend R.J.Campbell, in their almost too fastidious spirituality, admit divine sinlessness, which they cannot see even in their dreams. But they essentially deny human sin, which they can see in the street. The strongest saints and the strongest skeptics alike took positive evil as the starting-point of their argument. If it be true (as it certainly is) that a man can feel exquisite happiness in skinning a cat, then the religious philosopher can only draw one of two deductions. He must either deny the existence of God, as all atheists do; or he must deny the present union between God and man, as all Christians do. The new theologians seem to think it a highly rationalistic solution to deny the cat.
G.K. Chesterton - Orthodoxy (chapter 2, the Maniac.)
Works of art require some education in the beholder, before they can be thoroughly appreciated. We do not expect that the uninstructed should at once perceive the varied excellence of a painting from some master hand; we do not imagine that the superlative glories of the harmonies of the Princes of Song will enrapture the ears of clownish listeners. The must be something tin the man himself, before he can understand the wonders either of nature or of art…
By reasons of failures in our character and faults in our life, we are not capable of understanding all the separate beauties, and the united perfection of the Character of Christ, or of God his Father. Were we ourselves as pure as the angels in heaven, were we once what our race was in the Garden of Eden, immaculate and perfect, it is quite certain that we should have a far nobler idea of the character of God than we can possibly attain unto in our fallen state. But you cannot fail to notice that men, thought the alienation of their natures, are continually misrepresenting God, because they cannot appreciate his perfection.
C. H. Spurgeon: Spurgeon's gems
--
Prelude to Space
CS. Lewis - Poems
Charles Wesley 1758
all-fall-mall :
Jordan
Anonymous Rex (Anonymous Jordan )
If you set out to seek freedom, you must learn before all things Mastery over sense and soul, lest your wayward desirings, Lest your undisciplined members lead you now this way, now that way. Chaste be your mind and your body, and subject to you and obedient, Serving solely to seek their appointed goal and objective. None learns the secret of freedom, save only by way of control. Bonhoeffer (1947)
From sinners in the Hands of an Angry God. Point 6
There are in the souls of wicked men those hellish principles reigning, that would presently kindle and flame out into hell fire, if it were not for God's restraints. There is laid in the very nature of carnal men, a foundation for the torments of hell. There are those corrupt principles, in reigning power in them, and in full possession of them, that are seeds of hell fire. These principles are active and powerful, exceeding violent in their nature, and if it were not for the restraining hand of God upon them, they would soon break out, they would flame out after the same manner as the same corruptions, the same enmity does in the hearts of damned souls, and would beget the same torments as they do in them. The souls of the wicked are in scripture compared to the troubled sea, Isa. 57:20. For the present, God restrains their wickedness by his mighty power, as he does the raging waves of the troubled sea, saying, "Hitherto shalt thou come, but no further;" but if God should withdraw that restraining power, it would soon carry all before it. Sin is the ruin and misery of the soul; it is destructive in its nature; and if God should leave it without restraint, there would need nothing else to make the soul perfectly miserable. The corruption of the heart of man is immoderate and boundless in its fury; and while wicked men live here, it is like fire pent up by God's restraints, whereas if it were let loose, it would set on fire the course of nature; and as the heart is now a sink of sin, so if sin was not restrained, it would immediately turn the soul into fiery oven, or a furnace of fire and brimstone.